Abenomics Will Fail
BIS, IMF and G-20 Warned that the System is Going to Collapse
In the Next Financial Panic They might Close Stock Markets, Banks, Funds etc.
James G. Rickards is an American lawyer, economist,
and investment banker. He is a regular commentator on finance, and is the
author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars (2011) and The Death of
Money (2014).
Rickards worked on Wall Street for 35 years. As
general counsel for the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), he was
the principal negotiator in the 1998 bailout of LTCM by the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York.
In 2001, Rickards began using his financial expertise
to aid the US national security community and the US Department of Defense. He
served as facilitator of the first ever financial war games conducted by the
Pentagon. Currently, James Rickards is a portfolio manager at
West Shore Group and he lives in Connecticut.
Rickards attended Forex World Istanbul and delivered a
presentation on currency wars at the event on Friday. I found the opportunity
to ask a couple of questions to Jim following his book signing event. I am sharing this
short interview and Rickards’ exclusive comments here.
James Rickards and Erkan Öz at FX World Istanbul |
-Hello Jim.
-Hello, Erkan.
-My first question is, what do you think about ‘Abenomics’
this historical money printing experiment taking place in Japan?
-Japan has been in depression since 1990 so it is a 25
years depression. Depressions cannot be solved with liquidity or monetary
solutions. Depressions can be solved with structural solutions. You have
structural problems so you need structural solutions. Through all this time
Japan tried monetary solutions. They tried money printing, they tried lower
interest rates, they tried stimulus but they could not make fundamental
structural reforms for their economy. So that’s why they were not able to get
out of the depression. Abenomics will fail. It is failing unless they make
structural solutions. But since they have not I expect their depression to
continue and spread throughout the world.
-Why they cannot make these structural changes?
-It is mostly cultural because structural means you
have to allow banks to fail you have to allow businesses to fail you have to
allow competition you need a greater role for women you have to lower taxes
these are structural things they have nothing to do with liquidity or monetary
policy. The problem is about how the diet (Japanese parliament), the prime
minister’s office and finance minister’s office will organize the economy.
I recently met with Eisuke Sakakibara in Korea. He is called
‘Mr. Yen’. He is former deputy finance minister. He said one of the things you
have to understand about Japan is that the population is actually declining so
even if you have zero GDP growth the per capita GDP would increase… Japan is
not a poor country it is a very rich country. The stores are up the restaurants
are up on sale. They don’t feel the press but actually they do not have growth
and I expect this to continue.
-You said (in your earlier speech) that you don’t expect
a rate hike in the US in 2015.
-True.
-What do you expect for Japanese guys for 2015? Will
they continue stimulus?
-Yes. They are trying to solve a structural problem
with a liquidity solution. It won’t work but they think it will work. My
opinion does not matter. What matters is what’s Janet Yellen’s opinion,
Kuroda’s opinion and Abe’s opinion. They think this will work and so they gonna
keep trying. It wont work and they wont be able to raise rates. Because they
won’t gonna normalize rates in a world where growth is not going back to trend.
-What about the role of BIS, in today’s picture and can
it have a future role like you described for the IMF?
-I think in terms of a central bank of the world that
is really the IMF. The BIS is very important for two reasons. Number one: They
are the primary intermedia for manipulating the gold market. That is not a
mystery… BIS is manipulating the gold market. They are the intermedia between
the central banks and commercial banks and other central banks (of the world). They
have been doing that… That’s why they were created in 1930s and they have been
doing it ever since. (Number two): … It is also a very important meeting place for
the central bankers. One of my partners was David Mullins Jr. He was the vice
chairmen of the Federal Reserve in early 90s under Alan Greenspan. He said that
Greenspan did not like the (program) and stood off and David would go to the
BIS place. You know it is a clubhouse. Only central bankers are allowed ... So
it is a great place to change information.
Very interestingly BIS about a month ago issued a
warning of systemic risk. They said that the system is getting dangerously
close to collapse. A few weeks later the IMF issued a similar one. And then
last week G-20 finance ministers meeting at Australia issued a warning. What
was the last time you saw the three most powerful multilateral financial bodies
BIS, IMF and G-20 issued warnings. I have never seen it before. They are
telling you it is going to collapse. They see what I say and they are warning
you. People would ignore it but when it happens they would be able to say we have
told you. I think I have never seen anything like this. I have been in
international finance since 1974 and I have never seen a situation like this…
I think the BIS is very important but I don’t see it is
the world’s central bank I really think that role has been left to the IMF.
-Last question Jim, you are telling us in your books
that there would be a financial panic... Can you describe us what kind of
events could happen during this financial panic? What are your expectations?
I think this financial panic would be different than
the last one. The reason is that in all of the financial panics since 1971 the
solution was to print money provide liquidity. But prior to 1971 historically the
solution was to shut the doors. To close the stock exchange, close the banks, close
funds so you can not get your money. That’s what Nixon did in 1971 he closed
the gold door so you can’t get your gold. Since then 1987 stock market crash,
1994 Mexico crisis, 1998 Russia LTCM dot com, 2007 mortgage crisis, 2008 panic;
in all these crises the solution was to print more money. My expectation is
that next time money printing is not gonna work because they can’t print more
they have already printed a lot. So they gonna have to go to the old solution. We
are already seeing this. For example, the SEC passed a rule last month saying
that money market funds can suspend redemptions. This is the law. Now if you
talk to the US investors who have money market funds they think it is cash. They
think they can call the broker today and money is in the bank tomorrow. They
gonna find it is not cash. It has actually closed the door. That’s gonna be a
shock. So the financial panic itself will be as always a shock.... But the
remedy is not gonna be printing more money. They could print SDRs but that is a
little experimental. But, maybe in this case, they have to start closing things
down. Which in the distant past that was always what they did.
-Thank you very much Jim.
-Thank you, it was nice talking to you.